[[{“value”:”
A broad coalition of national housing and real estate organizations is urging Congressional leaders to reconsider proposed Build-to-Rent (BTR) provisions in the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. In a recent letter to lawmakers, the National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC), National Housing Conference, the Mortgage Bankers Association, the Real Estate Roundtable and numerous other housing industry groups outlined their concerns with language they say would effectively halt the development of new BTR communities.
According to the coalition, the bill was drafted in part to respond to concerns from President Trump and other policymakers about institutional investors in single-family rental housing. The groups note that the Administration had committed to exempt BTR from those efforts because of its role in expanding housing supply. However, they argue that the current legislative language fails to preserve that exemption in practice.
The letter points to a key provision that would require firms owning more than 350 single-family rental units to dispose of those homes after seven years. While intended to address concentration of ownership by large institutional investors, the groups contend that this rule would also capture BTR platforms that rely on scale to underwrite new communities and operate them efficiently.
The signatories stress that BTR development typically depends on large-scale capital commitments and economies of scale across portfolios that exceed the 350-unit threshold. In their view, imposing a mandatory disposition timeline creates the risk of forced sales and price pressure driven by statutory deadlines rather than market conditions. They warn that developers and investors are unlikely to commit new capital to the BTR segment if they face uncertainty around how and when they must exit these investments.
The coalition further argues that this chilling effect would ripple through the entire BTR supply chain, from land acquisition and construction to financing and long-term ownership strategies. By constraining the ability of firms to hold assets beyond seven years, the groups believe the bill as written would undermine a housing type that has been positioned as a tool to expand access to new, professionally managed rental homes.
In a separate statement, NMHC said it intends to continue direct engagement with lawmakers to revise the bill. The organization is seeking removal of the BTR language so that the legislation can align with what it describes as the original objectives of members of Congress and the Administration who support the measure. Until those changes are made, housing advocates are signaling that the proposed framework may work at cross purposes with broader efforts to increase rental housing supply.
The post Housing Groups Warn Senate ROAD Act BTR Language Could Choke Build-to-Rent Supply appeared first on CRE Market Beat.
“}]]
